
Krishna explains why the impersonal path is more difficult. 'Kleśo 'dhikataras teṣām avyaktāsakta-cetasām'—the difficulty (kleśaḥ) is greater (adhikataras) for them (teṣām) whose minds are attached to the unmanifest (avyaktāsakta-cetasām). 'Avyaktā hi gatir duḥkhaṁ dehavadbhir avāpyate'—the unmanifest goal (avyaktā gatiḥ) is indeed (hi) difficult (duḥkham) to attain (avāpyate) for those with bodies (dehavadbhih). This verse emphasizes the challenge: focusing on the formless, unmanifest Absolute is harder when you have a body. The body naturally relates to form, so the formless path requires transcending the body's nature. This sets up verse 12.6, which will describe those who worship Krishna but fall short, and verse 12.7, which will explain the ease of complete surrender.
How this ancient wisdom applies to your daily life

This verse reveals why the impersonal path is more difficult: the unmanifest goal is hard to attain when you have a body. Your body naturally relates to form, so focusing on the formless requires transcending your body's nature. This doesn't make the impersonal path wrong—it just makes it more challenging. The body wants to see, touch, relate to something concrete. The formless path requires going beyond that. This is why devotion is more accessible: it works with your body's nature rather than against it. You can relate personally, with love, with form. The path that works is the one that works with your nature, not against it.

Have you tried focusing on the abstract, the formless? How did your body respond? What makes personal devotion more natural than impersonal meditation? How does working with your nature compare to working against it?